Cardiorespiratory measures shortly after extubation and extubation outcomes in extremely preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure, nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation, and non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist are modes of non-invasive respiratory support. The objective was to investigate if cardiorespiratory measures performed shortly after extubation are associated with extubation outcomes and predictors of extubation success. METHODS: Randomized crossover trial of infants with birth weight (BW) ≤ 1250 g undergoing their first extubation. Shortly after extubation, electrocardiogram and electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) were recorded during 40 min on each mode. Measures of heart rate variability (HRV), diaphragmatic activity (Edi area, breath area and amplitude), and respiratory variability (RV) were computed on each mode and compared between infants with extubation success or failure (reintubation ≤ 7 days). RESULTS: Twenty-three extremely preterm infants with median [IQR] gestational age 25.9 weeks [25.2-26.4] and BW 760 g [595-900] were included: 14 success and 9 failures. There were significant differences for HRV (very low-frequency power and sample entropy) and RV parameters (breath areas, amplitudes and expiratory times) between groups, with moderate strength (0.75-0.80 areas under ROC curves) in predicting success. Diaphragmatic activity measures were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In extremely preterm infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support shortly after extubation, several cardiorespiratory variability parameters were associated with successful extubation with moderate predictive accuracy. IMPACT: Measures of cardiorespiratory variability, performed in extremely preterm infants while receiving NCPAP, NIPPV, and NIV-NAVA shortly after extubation, were significantly different between patients that succeeded or failed extubation. Cardiorespiratory variability measures had a moderate predictive accuracy for extubation success and can be potentially used as biomarkers, in recently extubated infants. Future investigations in this population may also consider including cardiorespiratory variability measures when assessing types of post-extubation respiratory support and promote individualized care.

Cardiorespiratory effects of NIV-NAVA, NIPPV, and NCPAP shortly after extubation in extremely preterm infants: A randomized crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the cardiorespiratory effects of noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA), nonsynchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) shortly after extubation. HYPOTHESIS: Types of noninvasive pressure support and the presence of synchronization may affect cardiorespiratory parameters. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized crossover trial. PATIENT-SUBJECT SELECTION: Infants with birth weight (BW) 1250 g or under, undergoing their first planned extubation were randomly assigned to all three modes using a computer-generated sequence. METHODOLOGY: Electrocardiogram and electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) were recorded for 30 min on each mode. Analysis of heart rate variability (HRV), diaphragmatic activity (Edi area, breath area, amplitude, inspiratory and expiratory times), and respiratory variability were compared between modes. RESULTS: Twenty-three infants had full data recordings and analysis: Median (IQR) gestational age = 25.9 weeks (25.2-26.4), BW = 760 g (595-900), and postnatal age 7 (4-19) days. There were no differences in HRV between modes. A significantly reduced Edi area and breath amplitude, and increased coefficient of variation (CV) of breath amplitude were observed during NIV-NAVA and NIPPV compared to NCPAP. A higher proportion of assisted breaths (99% vs. 51%; p < .001) provided a higher mean airway pressure (MAP; 9.4 vs. 8.2 cmH2 O; p = .002) with lower peak inflation pressures (PIPs; 14 vs. 16 cmH2 O; p < .001) during NIV-NAVA compared to NIPPV. CONCLUSIONS: NIV-NAVA and NIPPV applied shortly after extubation were associated with lower respiratory efforts and higher respiratory variability. These effects were more evident for NIV-NAVA where optimal patient-ventilator synchronization provided a higher MAP with lower PIPs.

Diaphragmatic activity and neural breathing variability during a 5-min endotracheal continuous positive airway pressure trial in extremely preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: Extremely preterm infants are often exposed to endotracheal tube continuous positive airway pressure (ETT-CPAP) trials to assess extubation readiness. The effects of ETT-CPAP trial on their diaphragmatic activity (Edi) and breathing variability is unknown. METHODS: Prospective observational study enrolling infants with birth weight ≤1250 g undergoing their first extubation attempt. Diaphragmatic activity, expressed as the absolute minimum (Edi min) and maximum values (Edi max), area under the Edi signal, and breath-by-breath analyses for breath areas, amplitudes, widths, and neural inspiratory and expiratory times, were analyzed during mechanical ventilation (MV) and ETT-CPAP. Neural breathing variability of each of these parameters was also calculated and compared between MV and ETT-CPAP. RESULTS: Thirteen infants with median (interquartile range) birth weight of 800 g [610-920] and gestational age of 25.4 weeks [24.4-26.3] were included. Diaphragmatic activity significantly increased during ETT-CPAP when compared to MV:Edi max (44.2 vs. 38.1 µV), breath area (449 vs. 312 µV·s), and amplitude (10.12 vs. 7.46 µV). Neural breathing variability during ETT-CPAP was characterized by increased variability for amplitude and area under the breath, and decreased for breath time and width. CONCLUSIONS: A 5-min ETT-CPAP in extremely preterm infants undergoing extubation imposed significant respiratory load with changes in respiratory variability. IMPACT: ETT-CPAP trials are often used to assess extubation readiness in extremely preterm infants, but its effects upon their respiratory system are not well known. Diaphragmatic activity analysis demonstrated that these infants are able to mount an important response to a short trial. A 5-min trial imposed a significant respiratory load evidenced by increased diaphragmatic activity and changes in breathing variability. Differences in breathing variability were observed between successful and failed extubations, which should be explored further in extubation readiness investigations. This type of trial cannot be recommended for preterm infants in clinical practice until clear standards and accuracy are established.